Ways of Seeing: A Second Reading
1. I think Berger’s use of the word “history” is significant in this essay. I believe it stands for a sort of bank of information that we use to come to conclusions about present day questions, problems, and ideas. I think we can use this to look at pictures by looking back at the history of the picture and knowing the background and the feelings that people had about that picture.
2. I dont really understand what is going on in the reading while Berger is discussing Hals’ painting. I’m not really familiar with this and I’m not sure if I understand the “mystification.”
chasjefferson said,
September 20, 2006 at 10:06 pm
I found that understanding the history is essential in understanding the emotion of the painting but I agree with you. As for the second question I would recomend rereading the essay.
Kyle Wadkins said,
September 20, 2006 at 10:09 pm
I think you got it right about the idea of history is an essential part of fiiguring out the meaning of the picture. Good job.
Sam DiPaola said,
September 20, 2006 at 10:09 pm
Jake,
I agree with “history” being significant. I think that it is interesting how a piece of art can tell us so much, depending on the time in which it was painted or produced.
khj1202 said,
September 20, 2006 at 10:14 pm
I think that your word “bank” that stands for history. I am kind of confused of Berger’s idea, but your writing helps me to get more closely.
Professor Groom said,
October 4, 2006 at 7:54 pm
Jake,
Your blog seems to be languishing as of late, any reason as to why?